AI agent skill · by @MadAppGang
Golang Performance
Use when profiling Go applications (pprof), running benchmarks, optimizing memory/CPU usage, or debugging performance bottlenecks in production Go code.
Archived 2026-10-23 · Source updated 2026-03-15 · License: MIT. Check the original repository for the latest version.
SKILL.md instructions
# Go Performance Optimization
## Overview
This skill provides comprehensive guidance for profiling, benchmarking, and optimizing Go applications. Use this skill when working on performance-critical code, investigating bottlenecks, or optimizing production systems.
**When to Use This Skill**:
- Profiling application performance
- Benchmarking code changes
- Investigating memory leaks or high allocations
- Optimizing hot paths
- Tuning garbage collection
- Reducing latency in production
**Core Tools**:
- `pprof` - CPU, memory, and goroutine profiling
- `go test -bench` - Benchmarking framework
- `go build -gcflags` - Escape analysis
- `GOGC` and `GOMEMLIMIT` - GC tuning
---
## 1. Profiling with pprof
### 1.1 CPU Profiling
**Enable CPU Profiling in Code**:
```go
import (
"os"
"runtime/pprof"
)
func main() {
f, err := os.Create("cpu.prof")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("could not create CPU profile: ", err)
}
defer f.Close()
if err := pprof.StartCPUProfile(f); err != nil {
log.Fatal("could not start CPU profile: ", err)
}
defer pprof.StopCPUProfile()
// Your application code here
runApplication()
}
```
**CLI Profiling**:
```bash
# Profile a test
go test -cpuprofile=cpu.prof -bench=.
# Profile a binary
go test -c
./myapp.test -test.cpuprofile=cpu.prof -test.bench=.
```
**Analysis Commands**:
```bash
# Interactive web UI (recommended)
go tool pprof -http=:8080 cpu.prof
# Text output - top functions by CPU time
go tool pprof -top cpu.prof
# Top 20 with cumulative time
go tool pprof -top -cum cpu.prof | head -20
# Call graph visualization
go tool pprof -svg cpu.prof > cpu.svg
# Focus on specific function
go tool pprof -focus=processData cpu.prof
# Exclude standard library
go tool pprof -ignore=runtime cpu.prof
```
**Interpreting CPU Profiles**:
- **flat**: Time spent in function itself (excludes callees)
- **flat%**: Percentage of total runtime
- **sum%**: Cumulative percentage
- **cum**: Time spent in function and callees
- **cum%**: Cumulative time percentage
**Example Output**:
```
Showing nodes accounting for 2.50s, 83.33% of 3.00s total
flat flat% sum% cum cum%
0.80s 26.67% 26.67% 1.20s 40.00% processData
0.60s 20.00% 46.67% 0.90s 30.00% parseJSON
0.50s 16.67% 63.34% 0.50s 16.67% validateInput
```
Focus optimization on functions with high `flat` (own time) or `cum` (total time).
---
### 1.2 Memory Profiling
**Heap Profiling**:
```go
import (
"os"
"runtime/pprof"
)
func captureHeapProfile() {
f, err := os.Create("mem.prof")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("could not create memory profile: ", err)
}
defer f.Close()
// Force GC before capturing heap
runtime.GC()
if err := pprof.WriteHeapProfile(f); err != nil {
log.Fatal("could not write memory profile: ", err)
}
}
```
**Memory Profiling via CLI**:
```bash
# Profile memory allocations during test
go test -memprofile=mem.prof -bench=.
# Run benchmark multiple times for stable results
go test -memprofile=mem.prof -bench=. -benchtime=10s
```
**Analysis Commands**:
```bash
# Web UI showing allocation sites
go tool pprof -http=:8080 mem.prof
# Top allocators
go tool pprof -top mem.prof
# Focus on allocations (inuse_space)
go tool pprof -sample_index=inuse_space -top mem.prof
# Focus on allocation counts (inuse_objects)
go tool pprof -sample_index=inuse_objects -top mem.prof
# Show cumulative allocations (alloc_space)
go tool pprof -sample_index=alloc_space -top mem.prof
# Compare two profiles (before/after)
go tool pprof -base=before.prof after.prof
```
**Memory Profile Types**:
- `inuse_space`: Memory currently in use (default)
- `inuse_objects`: Objects currently in use
- `alloc_space`: Total allocations since start
- `alloc_objects`: Total object allocations
---
### 1.3 Goroutine Profiling
**Detect Goroutine Leaks**:
```go
import (
"os"
"runtime/pprof"
)
func captureGoroutineProfile() {
f, err := os.Create("goroutine.prof")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("could not create goroutine profile: ", err)
}
defer f.Close()
if err := pprof.Lookup("goroutine").WriteTo(f, 0); err != nil {
log.Fatal("could not write goroutine profile: ", err)
}
}
```
**Analysis**:
```bash
go tool pprof -http=:8080 goroutine.prof
go tool pprof -top goroutine.prof
```
**Goroutine Leak Indicators**:
- Steadily increasing goroutine count
- Many goroutines blocked on channel recv/send
- Goroutines without termination mechanism
---
### 1.4 HTTP Profiling Endpoint (Production-Safe)
**Enable pprof HTTP Server**:
```go
import (
_ "net/http/pprof"
"net/http"
)
func main() {
// Start pprof server on separate port (localhost only)
go func() {
log.Println("pprof server listening on localhost:6060")
log.Println(http.ListenAndServe("localhost:6060", nil))
}()
// Your application here
runServer()
}
```
**Access Profiles via HTTP**:
```bash
# CPU profile (30 seconds)
curl http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/profile?seconds=30 > cpu.prof
# Heap profile
curl http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/heap > heap.prof
# Goroutine profile
curl http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/goroutine > goroutine.prof
# Analyze immediately
go tool pprof http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/profile
# Web UI
go tool pprof -http=:8080 http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/profile
```
**Available Endpoints**:
- `/debug/pprof/` - Index of all profiles
- `/debug/pprof/profile` - CPU profile
- `/debug/pprof/heap` - Heap profile
- `/debug/pprof/goroutine` - Goroutine stack traces
- `/debug/pprof/threadcreate` - Thread creation profile
- `/debug/pprof/block` - Blocking profile
- `/debug/pprof/mutex` - Mutex contention profile
**Production Security**:
```go
// Only expose on localhost
http.ListenAndServe("localhost:6060", nil)
// Or use SSH port forwarding
// ssh -L 6060:localhost:6060 user@production-host
// Then access http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/
```
---
## 2. Benchmarking
### 2.1 Basic Benchmarks
**Simple Benchmark**:
```go
func BenchmarkStringConcat(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
result := "hello" + " " + "world"
_ = result // Prevent compiler optimization
}
}
```
**Benchmark with Setup**:
```go
func BenchmarkProcessData(b *testing.B) {
data := generateTestData(1000)
b.ResetTimer() // Exclude setup time
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
processData(data)
}
}
```
**Running Benchmarks**:
```bash
# Run all benchmarks
go test -bench=.
# Run specific benchmark
go test -bench=BenchmarkStringConcat
# Benchmark with memory statistics
go test -bench=. -benchmem
# Run multiple iterations for stability
go test -bench=. -count=5
# Longer benchmark time for accurate results
go test -bench=. -benchtime=10s
# CPU profile during benchmark
go test -bench=. -cpuprofile=cpu.prof
```
---
### 2.2 Sub-Benchmarks
**Compare Multiple Implementations**:
```go
func BenchmarkStringBuilding(b *testing.B) {
items := []string{"hello", "world", "foo", "bar"}
b.Run("Concat", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
result := ""
for _, item := range items {
result += item
}
_ = result
}
})
b.Run("StringBuilder", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
var sb strings.Builder
for _, item := range items {
sb.WriteString(item)
}
_ = sb.String()
}
})
b.Run("Join", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
result := strings.Join(items, "")
_ = result
}
})
}
```
**Output**:
```
BenchmarkStringBuilding/Concat-8 500000 3245 ns/op 96 B/op 5 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringBuilding/StringBuilder-8 2000000 825 ns/op 64 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringBuilding/Join-8 2000000 780 ns/op 48 B/op 1 allocs/op
```
---
### 2.3 Memory Reporting
**Track Allocations**:
```go
func BenchmarkWithAllocs(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
data := make([]int, 1000)
_ = data
}
}
```
**Output Interpretation**:
```
BenchmarkWithAllocs-8 200000 8234 ns/op 8192 B/op 1 allocs/op
------ ---- ---- ----
iters ns/op bytes/op allocs/op
```
- **ns/op**: Nanoseconds per operation
- **B/op**: Bytes allocated per operation
- **allocs/op**: Number of allocations per operation
**Zero Allocation Goal**:
```go
// Bad: 2 allocations
func process(data string) string {
upper := strings.ToUpper(data) // 1 alloc
return strings.TrimSpace(upper) // 1 alloc
}
// Better: 1 allocation (reuse buffer)
func process(data string) string {
var sb strings.Builder
sb.Grow(len(data))
for _, r := range data {
if !unicode.IsSpace(r) {
sb.WriteRune(unicode.ToUpper(r))
}
}
return sb.String()
}
```
---
### 2.4 Benchmark Analysis with benchstat
**Compare Before/After**:
```bash
# Baseline
go test -bench=. -count=10 > old.txt
# After optimization
go test -bench=. -count=10 > new.txt
# Statistical comparison
go install golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat@latest
benchstat old.txt new.txt
```
**Example Output**:
```
name old time/op new time/op delta
StringConcat-8 3.24µs ± 2% 0.82µs ± 1% -74.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
StringConcat-8 96.0B ± 0% 64.0B ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
StringConcat-8 5.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% -80.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
```
**Interpretation**:
- `±2%` - Variance across runs
- `(p=0.000)` - Statistical significance (p < 0.05 = significant)
- `n=10+10` - Number of samples used
---
## 3. Memory Optimization
### 3.1 Pre-allocate Slices
**Problem: Repeated Reallocation**:
```go
// Bad: 14 reallocations for 10,000 items
func inefficient() []int {
var data []int
for i := 0; i < 10000; i++ {
data = append(data, i)
}
return data
}
```
**Solution: Pre-allocate Capacity**:
```go
// Good: 1 allocation
func efficient() []int {
data := make([]int, 0, 10000)
for i := 0; i < 10000; i++ {
data = append(data, i)
}
return data
}
```
**Transformation Pattern**:
```go
func transformItems(input []string) []Result {
output := make([]Result, 0, len(input))
for _, item := range input {
output = append(output, transform(item))
}
return output
}
```
**Estimated Capacity**:
```go
func filterItems(input []string, minLen int) []string {
// Estimate ~50% will pass
output := make([]string, 0, len(input)/2)
for _, item := range input {
if len(item) >= minLen {
output = append(output, item)
}
}
return output
}
```
**Benchmark Impact**: 5x faster for 10,000 items
---
### 3.2 strings.Builder for Concatenation
**Problem: O(N²) String Concatenation**:
```go
// Bad: Creates new string on every iteration
func badConcat(items []string) string {
result := ""
for _, item := range items {
result += item // New allocation each time
}
return result
}
```
**Solution: strings.Builder (O(N))**:
```go
// Good: Single allocation with growth
func goodConcat(items []string) string {
var sb strings.Builder
// Pre-allocate if size known
totalLen := 0
for _, item := range items {
totalLen += len(item)
}
sb.Grow(totalLen)
for _, item := range items {
sb.WriteString(item)
}
return sb.String()
}
```
**Benchmark**: 50x faster for 100 concatenations
**Builder Methods**:
```go
var sb strings.Builder
sb.WriteString("hello") // Write string
sb.WriteByte('!') // Write single byte
sb.WriteRune('✓') // Write rune (Unicode)
sb.Grow(100) // Pre-allocate capacity
result := sb.String() // Get final string
sb.Reset() // Reuse builder
```
---
### 3.3 Escape Analysis
**View Escape Decisions**:
```bash
go build -gcflags='-m -m' main.go 2>&1 | grep "escapes to heap"
```
**Stack vs Heap**:
```go
// Stack allocated (fast)
func sumArray() int {
data := [100]int{} // Stack
sum := 0
for _, v := range data {
sum += v
}
return sum
}
// Heap allocated (slower, escapes)
func createData() *Data {
data := &Data{} // Escapes: pointer returned
return data
}
```
**Common Escape Scenarios**:
```go
// 1. Returning pointer to local variable
func escape1() *int {
x := 42
return &x // Escapes
}
// 2. Interface conversion
func escape2() interface{} {
x := 42
return x // Escapes (interface)
}
// 3. Storing in interface field
func escape3(data interface{}) {
globalVar = data // Escapes
}
// 4. Size too large for stack
func escape4() {
data := make([]byte, 1<<20) // 1MB, escapes
_ = data
}
// 5. Slice append beyond capacity
func escape5() {
data := make([]int, 0, 10)
for i := 0; i < 100; i++ {
data = append(data, i) // May escape
}
}
```
**Reducing Escapes**:
```go
// Before: Escapes to heap
for _, item := range items {
result := &Result{Value: item}
process(result)
}
// After: Stack allocated (if process doesn't store it)
var result Result
for _, item := range items {
result.Value = item
process(&result)
}
```
---
### 3.4 Reducing Allocations in Hot Paths
**Reuse Buffers**:
```go
// Package-level buffer pool
var bufferPool = sync.Pool{
New: func() interface{} {
return new(bytes.Buffer)
},
}
func processData(data []byte) string {
buf := bufferPool.Get().(*bytes.Buffer)
buf.Reset() // Clear previous content
defer bufferPool.Put(buf)
// Use buffer
buf.Write(data)
return buf.String()
}
```
**Pre-allocate Maps**:
```go
// Bad: Multiple rehashes
m := make(map[string]Item)
for _, item := range items {
m[item.ID] = item
}
// Good: Single allocation
m := make(map[string]Item, len(items))
for _, item := range items {
m[item.ID] = item
}
```
---
## 4. GC Tuning
### 4.1 GOGC Environment Variable
**Default Behavior**:
```bash
# Default: GC when heap grows 100%
GOGC=100 ./myapp
```
**Tuning Options**:
```bash
# Less frequent GC (uses more memory, higher throughput)
GOGC=200 ./myapp
# More frequent GC (uses less memory, lower latency)
GOGC=50 ./myapp
# Disable GC (debugging only)
GOGC=off ./myapp
```
**How GOGC Works**:
- `GOGC=100`: GC triggers when heap doubles
- `GOGC=200`: GC triggers when heap triples
- `GOGC=50`: GC triggers when heap grows 50%
**Example**:
- Current heap: 100MB
- `GOGC=100`: GC at 200MB
- `GOGC=200`: GC at 300MB
- `GOGC=50`: GC at 150MB
---
### 4.2 GOMEMLIMIT (Go 1.19+)
**Set Memory Limit**:
```bash
# Via environment variable
GOMEMLIMIT=10GiB ./myapp
# Programmatically
debug.SetMemoryLimit(10 << 30) // 10GB
```
**Units Supported**:
- `B` - Bytes
- `KiB` - Kibibytes (1024 bytes)
- `MiB` - Mebibytes (1024² bytes)
- `GiB` - Gibibytes (1024³ bytes)
- `TiB` - Tebibytes (1024⁴ bytes)
**How it Works**:
- Soft limit (not hard cap)
- GC becomes more aggressive near limit
- Prevents OOM kills in containers
- Works alongside GOGC
---
### 4.3 GC Tuning Decision Matrix
| Scenario | GOGC | GOMEMLIMIT | Rationale |
|----------|------|------------|-----------|
| **High throughput batch** | 200-400 | 80% of RAM | Reduce GC overhead, use available memory |
| **Memory-constrained (container)** | 50-100 | Limit - 10% | Prevent OOM, more frequent GC |
| **Latency-sensitive API** | 100 | Not set | Default balance between memory and pause |
| **Large heap (>4GB)** | 100-200 | 80% of RAM | Reduce GC frequency for large heaps |
| **Short-lived processes** | 400+ | Not set | Maximize speed, process ends soon |
**Example: Container with 2GB RAM**:
```bash
GOGC=75 GOMEMLIMIT=1800MiB ./myapp
```
**Example: Batch Processing**:
```bash
GOGC=300 GOMEMLIMIT=24GiB ./batch-processor
```
**Monitoring GC**:
```go
import "runtime/debug"
// Get GC stats
var stats debug.GCStats
debug.ReadGCStats(&stats)
fmt.Printf("Last GC: %v\n", stats.LastGC)
fmt.Printf("Num GC: %d\n", stats.NumGC)
```
---
## 5. Performance Anti-Patterns
### 5.1 String Concatenation in Loops
**Anti-Pattern**:
```go
// Bad: O(N²) complexity
func buildString(items []string) string {
result := ""
for _, item := range items {
result += item // New allocation each iteration
}
return result
}
```
**Solution**:
```go
// Good: O(N) complexity
func buildString(items []string) string {
var sb strings.Builder
for _, item := range items {
sb.WriteString(item)
}
return sb.String()
}
```
---
### 5.2 Unnecessary Allocations
**Anti-Pattern 1: Creating Pointers in Loops**:
```go
// Bad: N allocations
for _, item := range items {
ptr := &item
process(ptr)
}
// Good: Reuse pointer
var ptr *Item
for i := range items {
ptr = &items[i]
process(ptr)
}
```
**Anti-Pattern 2: Converting to Interface**:
```go
// Bad: Causes allocation
func printAll(items []MyStruct) {
for _, item := range items {
fmt.Println(item) // Interface conversion
}
}
// Better: Pass pointer to avoid copy
func printAll(items []MyStruct) {
for i := range items {
fmt.Println(&items[i])
}
}
```
---
### 5.3 Defer Overhead in Hot Paths
**Anti-Pattern**:
```go
// Bad: Defer has overhead in hot loops
func processMany(items []Item) {
for _, item := range items {
mu.Lock()
defer mu.Unlock() // Accumulates, never runs until function exits
process(item)
}
}
```
**Solution**:
```go
// Good: Manual unlock in loop
func processMany(items []Item) {
for _, item := range items {
mu.Lock()
process(item)
mu.Unlock()
}
}
// Or: Extract to function with defer
func processMany(items []Item) {
for _, item := range items {
processOne(item)
}
}
func processOne(item Item) {
mu.Lock()
defer mu.Unlock()
process(item)
}
```
---
## Quick Reference
### Profiling Commands
```bash
# CPU profile
go test -cpuprofile=cpu.prof -bench=.
go tool pprof -http=:8080 cpu.prof
# Memory profile
go test -memprofile=mem.prof -bench=.
go tool pprof -http=:8080 mem.prof
# HTTP profiling (production)
curl http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/profile?seconds=30 > cpu.prof
```
### Benchmarking Commands
```bash
# Run benchmarks with memory stats
go test -bench=. -benchmem
# Compare before/after
go test -bench=. -count=10 > old.txt
benchstat old.txt new.txt
```
### Optimization Checklist
- [ ] Profile before optimizing (identify hot paths)
- [ ] Pre-allocate slices with known capacity
- [ ] Use `strings.Builder` for string concatenation
- [ ] Check escape analysis with `-gcflags='-m'`
- [ ] Reduce allocations in hot loops
- [ ] Reuse buffers with `sync.Pool`
- [ ] Benchmark changes with `-benchmem`
- [ ] Tune GOGC/GOMEMLIMIT for workload
---
**Related Skills**:
- `golang` - Core Go idioms and patterns
- `database-patterns` - Database performance optimization
- `api-design` - API performance best practices
**Sources**:
- Go Diagnostics Guide: https://go.dev/doc/diagnostics
- Go Blog: Profiling Go Programs
- runtime/pprof package documentation
- Go 1.19 Memory Limit blog post
- benchstat tool documentation