AI agent skill · by @Optima-CityU
Moead
MOEA/D (Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition) method skill. USE WHEN the user explicitly requests MOEA/D / Decomposition-based multi-objective evolution, or wants weight-vector decomposition with neighborhood collaboration.
Archived 2026-10-23 · Source updated 2026-10-09 · License: BSD-3-Clause. Check the original repository for the latest version.
SKILL.md instructions
# MOEA/D Skill
> **Paper**: Zhang & Li, "MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition", IEEE TEC 2007.
## 1. Method Essence
MOEA/D **decomposes** a multi-objective problem into N single-objective sub-problems: each sub-problem is defined by a weight vector + aggregation function (weighted sum / Tchebycheff), and the entire population = a set of uniformly distributed weight vectors. Core mechanisms:
- **Sub-problem division**: Each weight vector corresponds to a direction on the front; the population collectively covers the entire front
- **Neighborhood collaboration**: Each sub-problem exchanges information only with its T nearest weight vectors (neighbors) — crossover/mutation occurs mainly between neighboring sub-problems, replacing global pairing
- **Aggregation function**: Tchebycheff `max_i w_i |f_i - z_i|` (z is reference point) is effective for non-convex fronts and is commonly used
- **Update rule**: If a new individual improves the aggregation value for its sub-problem, it replaces that sub-problem and its neighbors' solutions
## 2. Recommended Parameters
See `params.yaml` in this directory for the recommended parameter configuration.
**Note**: The number of objectives is determined by the length of `objective_metrics`. Weight vectors are generated in this dimensional space.
### What Happens During Evolution
1. Generate uniform weight vectors in objective space
2. Initialize population (one solution per weight vector)
3. Each generation:
- For each sub-problem (weight vector):
- Select parents from neighborhood
- Generate offspring via LLM operators
- Evaluate offspring
- Update sub-problem and neighbors if offspring improves aggregation
4. Weight vectors define search directions; population covers the front uniformly
5. Final front is the set of best solutions for each weight vector
### Common Pitfalls
- Front has gaps → increase `population_size` (more weight vectors)
- Convergence uneven → check weight vector distribution; some directions may be harder
- All solutions clustered → reduce neighborhood size T for more local search
- Non-convex front → Tchebycheff aggregation works better than weighted sum
## 4. Acceptance Criteria
- Weight vectors uniformly distributed in objective space
- Each sub-problem has a corresponding solution on the front
- Front covers all weight vector directions (no missing regions)
- Neighborhood collaboration visible (solutions from nearby weights share features)
- Final front represents the full trade-off surface